Westpac wins out over ASIC on responsible home loan caseBY...

Westpac wins out over ASIC on responsible home loan case
BY BUSINESS REPORTER MICHAEL JANDA UPDATED

Westpac last year agreed to pay ASIC a $35m settlement, but this was rejected by the court.ABC NEWS: ALISTAIR KROIEThe Federal Court has dismissed ASIC's responsible lending case against Westpac and ordered the regulator to pay the bank's costs.ASIC had alleged that Westpac breached responsible lending laws on up to 262,000 home loan approvals made using an automated process that relied on the Household Expenditure Measure benchmark, rather than using each applicant's individually assessed living costs.In September last year, Westpac agreed to pay a $35 million settlement to ASICand admit that it breached responsible lending laws.However, in November Justice Nye Perram sensationally rejected the settlement, finding that it was ambiguous and that the parties did not actually agree on what the responsible lending laws required and, therefore, how many loans were in breach and what the penalty should be.Today, Justice Perram dismissed ASIC's case against the bank, awarding costs against the regulator and leaving it negotiating with Westpac over the legal bill in reaching the failed settlement.In the rejected settlement, Westpac had admitted its automated loan approval system used the Household Expenditure Measure (HEM) — a relatively low estimate of basic living expenses — to calculate potential borrowers' living costs.Computer says 'yes'Westpac is in trouble over automated home loan approvals using low-ball living expense estimates. Other banks may also be in the frame.The bank used the HEM instead of actually evaluating the customers' declared living expenses, and admitted this practice breached the National Consumer Credit Protection Act in certain circumstances.However, there was an irreconcilable difference of opinion between ASIC and Westpac over when use of the HEM breached the law.Out of 261,987 loans approved using the HEM benchmark, 211,937 involved customers declaring expenses that were lower than the HEM — that is, below the typical household's spending on basic goods and services, and in the bottom 25 per cent of household spending on less essential items.In these cases, use of the HEM actually reduced the amount of money the customer could borrow compared to what they declared.In the roughly 50,000 cases where declared living expenses were higher than the HEM, use of the benchmark increased the loan amount the customer could receive.However, in about 45,000 of these cases, both ASIC and Westpac agreed the use of the customers' actual expenses rather than the HEM would have had no impact on whether they were deemed suitable for the loan.Zero or 261,987 irresponsible loans?This is the question left unanswered by the original settlement proposed by ASIC and Westpac over the bank's alleged responsible lending law breaches.That left 5,041 loans approved using the HEM that may not have been if actual declared expenses were used — they would have been referred to manual credit assessment instead.This meant some of those customers might have been approved for home loans they potentially could not afford to repay without financial hardship.In rejecting the settlement, Justice Perram said neither party could explain what would have happened after that manual loan assessment process, whether any of these 5,041 loans were actually unsuitable and whether any significant harm had been done to any or all of those customers.POSTED ABOUT AN HOUR AGOSHAREEmail Facebook Twitter WhatsAppRELATEDWestpac hit with class action that could affect thousands of home loansWestpac and ASIC fight over responsible lending after court rejects $35m dealHow many times did Westpac breach lending laws? The answer could affect house pricesJudge blocks Westpac's $35m deal with ASIC for breaching lending lawsTop StoriesRich school, poor school: Here's where 8,500 schools rank on the income ladderKim Forrest and her husband got an instore credit card. Then they were sued for bankruptcyLive: NSW Now: Man bites police officer, car plunges off bridgeTeen fugitives evaded Canadian manhunt for days before taking their own lives, police sayHong Kong airport protest leaves Australians among thousands trapped in transitDeath of Melbourne researcher struck by falling tree 'leaves an enormous hole in the lives of many'The 'world's biggest superstar' just sent Australia into a spinWhat's in a name? Europe wants to stop Australian producers from selling 'feta', 'scotch beef''Patch over' defections to rival outlaw group spark bikie violence, court documents reveal'It's a matter of urgency': Dwindling water supply in remote Indigenous communityMorrison pledges $500 million to fight climate change across Pacific islandsFunder of massive Takata airbag class action challenged in High CourtAfter Hong Kong protests, is Taiwan the next flashpoint?Analysis: How to spot a fake review: You’re probably worse at it than you realiseOpinion: While Grace has shared her story, thousands more still can't tell theirs'I don't want India in my homeland': Kashmir crisis exposes fault lines in Australian communities'Justin Langer has another thing coming': Archer warns Australia not to underestimate himAustralia must become constant construction zone or risk collapse, advisory body saysAfter living on five acres, Glenda Stephens loves her 80-square-metre 'micro lot'ASX to fall sharply as Argentinian stocks lose half their value, Wall St slidesPM's pick for the Senate facing a major challengeRussia buries nuclear scientists killed during botched weapons test, but radiation fears remainFormer US counter-terror chief raises alarm over right-wing extremismOpinion: August has left a shadow across America, but there is light on the horizon'I went from one benzo to two benzos to three': Australia's hidden drug problemMORE FROM ABC NEWSJust InPoliticsWorldBusinessAnalysisSportScienceHealthArtsFact CheckOtherTop of pageChange to standard viewABC NewsJust InWorldBusinessHealthEntertainmentSportAnalysis & OpinionWeatherTopicsArchiveCorrections & ClarificationsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyAccessibilityContact the ABC© 2019 ABC