Slampoil
Let us know your detailed opinions about this wet-gas issue now.
Honestly though!
Btw, NSE management has confessed that they hve intersected wet gas in GB-1.
Now it's time to reveal the SEISMIC SECTION of GB-1 location!
They should answer my question regarding to the anticline!
"Is there an anticline or any other type of structure which is expected to be conventional reservoir target just above the primary target Goldwyer shale formation!"
Posting this again;
This is from the "Why is 600m early background gas increase ?" thread posted by me on Feb.4.
"As we know Gibb Maitland-1 well will be drilled down to 3900m as the Goldwyer formation is about 350m lower than Nicolay-1 well at this location.
However we have started to get the background gas increase at around 2500m-2600m in Gibb Maitland-1 well location despite we saw the same background gas increase at 2,850m in Nicolay-1 well !"
IMO NSE must have an explanation to this!
Then I posted this ”Drilling contract terminated” on Feb.8.
I said "As you know I was mentioning that there could be an anticline here according to Kingsway Oil's maps before."
And posted this graphic.
Of course, if there is an anticline there that would be a conventional reservoir for significant amount of oil and gas as any anticline in Kidson sub-basin would be very large. Because Kidson sub-basin was under compression during Silurian (right after Ordovician when the lower and upper Goldwyer shale layers were evolved) and then again in Mid-Devonian and early Carboniferous, a lot of anticlines in this basin should have been evolved. But there are very little number of minor faults on Kidson. That is a perfect environment for accumulation of world class petroleum reservoirs.
...
You can see below that if there is anticline, which means all of the formation layers including Goldwyer, were already lifted up to a depth which even a drill rig like Buru's Ensign Rig 32 can easily drill by its 3800m depth capacity.
That’s' all I can say.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?