$US16m for a two year LEASE of an Early Production Facility.
The above does not include the cost of the facility if the JV partnership decided to buy it following the two year lease.
It also does not include any civil works, purchase of land, site installation equipment, fencing, security, etc, etc.
Would BP have accepted the condensate produced by the plant without further processing to remove the volatiles? If not, then that would have added to the costs of the Wharf proposed plant.
Would the Wharf proposed plant have ended up much cheaper than what we got?
I will admit looking at the details I am unclear on what the rate of production would be but then I am no expert.
http://www.wharfplc.com/Wharf_Web_22-09-2012/News/EOG%20Gas%20EPF%20Proposal%20V2%20LOM%2025%20May%202011%20Sent%20To%20Empire%20Et%20Al.pdf
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EGO
- wharf dispute
wharf dispute, page-115
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EGO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online