Yes hkhf I should not have have estimated the NCP12 grade from Fig. 2 across an 18m interval. To correctly compare apples with apples, I should have estimated across 9m (centred on 221m downhole) as that is the reported interval of abundant chalcocite mineralisation as you correctly point out. As a consequence my estimated grade increases from about 0.7% to about 1.1% coincident with an estimated true thickness of about 4.4m.
I checked the intervals I used to estimate grades for the earlier 5 holes and they are unchanged and consistent with taking the 9m interval, and I recalculated my average of the 6 holes to date - it increases to about 1.2 - 1.3% (from about 1.1 - 1.2%).
Thank you for pointing out the mistake and of course I'm mortified and need to be more careful. However I remain confident with the conclusion that the average grades from the 6 holes to date are significantly less than what is needed in this vicinity for an underground mine similar to the Zone 5 mine.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CBE
- What’s CBE Worth
What’s CBE Worth, page-942
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 150 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CBE (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
5.1¢ |
Change
-0.003(5.56%) |
Mkt cap ! $16.88M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
5.5¢ | 5.5¢ | 5.1¢ | $15.59K | 299.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 15683 | 5.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.4¢ | 92592 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 15683 | 0.051 |
2 | 120000 | 0.050 |
1 | 100000 | 0.047 |
1 | 10000 | 0.046 |
1 | 300000 | 0.045 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.054 | 92592 | 1 |
0.055 | 223961 | 3 |
0.059 | 302937 | 3 |
0.060 | 100000 | 1 |
0.065 | 21269 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.05pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CBE (ASX) Chart |