What’s wrong with EDE?, page-23

You really have to wonder why someone would spam this forum with lie after lie.

Denver International Airport trialled EdenCrete a yr ago. They have used it because a team of specialists have decided that EdenCrete is the best product to meet the exacting specifications. Simple. Why are they insisting EDE HC posters have no idea what they are talking about? We are but discussing these developments, nothing to do with us, why the constant insults?

Atlantic Waste Services Inc is a privately owned company. They are sick of the amount of money wasted by constantly having to replace the epoxy coating used by such services to increase abrasion resistance and decrease permeability. After testing EdenCrete they have gone ahead and used it at 4gal/yd3, which is still cheaper than the previous solution. Concrete has numerous disadvantages, there are numerous solutions to these. Changing the mix design to add more cement as is repeatedly demanded on this forum as the solution is not the answer, why do you think additives and coatings are such a huge market. Yes it has taken time for Edencrete to prove itself, but projects like these prove it works, and that customers/engineers/contractors are getting more comfortable using it.

FHWA approved EdenCrete for use based on proven data;

"The approval for use of EdenCrete® in GDOT federally funded projects, followed a review in May 2017 by FHWA of the performance of EdenCrete® in the following projects in Georgia:
• the GDOT I-20 field trail (August 2015),
• the GDOT I -16 commercial slab replacement project (February 2017),
• the GDOT State Highway new concrete road pavement field trail (March 2017),
• the MARTA (Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority) field trial at a bus depot in Atlanta (May 2016), and
• a very heavy load bearing, high abrasion application on a hard-stand area at a large private factory (April 2016).
This initial FHWA acceptance in Georgia of the use of EdenCrete® in federally funded repair projects is a major advance in the EdenCrete® marketing programme and may assist in gaining FHWA approvals for use of EdenCrete®, in due course, in other States."

AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES EXCHANGE ANNOUNCEMENT 21 September 2017
FHWA APPROVES USE OF EDENCRETE® IN FEDERALLY FUNDED REPAIR PROJECTS IN GEORGIA

But they cannot specify it by name so the FHWA/GDoT projects using EdenCrete have been won by tender where the specifications could only be satisfied by utilising EdenCrete. If it could be achieved by a cheaper mix, it would have been, but it can't. And the accusation that these jobs are 'political' is an outright illegal act. Doesn't matter who you are or know, to influence such a decision would be whistleblown and the person attempting it arrested. To claim such matters for years would make it through various departments and a committee of 12 without someone bringing up that EdenCrete doesn't create a more durable concrete for a life cycle cost savings is both defamatory and absurd.

The Kansas Rise project is yet another recent example of EdenCrete being used to solve problems in an economical manner. Yet still the spamming that noone is interested and there is no progress being made.

I am of the opinion that all opinions are to be listened to but you really have to go for a full salt lick rather than just a grain to understand why such obvious falsehoods clutter up this forum to the exclusion of rational discussion.

IMO DYOR GLTS