What a performance, page-51

Email to Issuer Misconduct (ASX) following up my initial report:

With regards to this matter I wanted to inform you of additional information that has come to light.

In addition to the Tianjin store that is reportedly open as advertised on auriginfoods.com (http://auriginfood.com/index.php/2017/12/24/auriginfoodsintianjing20171224 + additional images: http://www.senn.com.cn/sx/2017/12/12/225670.html), there is another store which appears to be open (or very nearly so) per the video and images available on Weibo (https://weibo.com/u/6429315282). I have attached a number of screenshots in case they are removed from the Chinese social media site. The images were uploaded on Weibo well prior to DAU's response to the ASX questions which claimed that "No stores have been set up in China or elsewhere." Images of these two stores suggest DAU was lying to the ASX in their recent response and a shareholders were not provided with sufficient information on which to vote for the sale of Aurigin Foods to DAU directors.

Further to this an 'Aurigin Organic' store was opened in Sydney at 192 Harris St, Pyrmont. Aurigin Organic, while registered separately to (& owned "independently of") Aurigin Foods, appears to have been developed in conjunction with the main Aurigin Foods brand and I expect will be marketed and sold together through some of the same stores. I think investigation into whether any funds supplied by DAU were used to setup the Aurigin Organic store is warranted. There is also a question of Trademark/Copyright breach given Aurigin Foods owns the name (https://search.ipaustralia.gov.au/trademarks/search/view/1821733?q=aurigin foods) in the sector that Aurigin Organic is trading and their logos are very similar, though I guess that is inconsequential if regulators sit on their hands and the sale is allowed to go through.