what are the positives, page-3

What I find interesting about reviewing the history of threads and posts on stocks that I follow is when I see

1. a poster who has exclusively posted on just one stock and with many posts over 6 months+...

2. whose depth of research and knowledge is clearly quite extensive...

3. whose posts appear universally negative in their analysis no matter what the circumstances of the company's activities are at the time...

4. and whose intellect seems formidable and writing skills are of a high standard...

Upon reviewing the content of these posts one cannot help but be cynical about the true motive behind them and whether or not a poster is talking from his/her own hip pocket or on behalf of some other vested interest eg. his/her employer assuming it might be a broker, competitor or whatever. In any event, it could be that the aim is to influence those investors with less resolve and who do not do their own research to part with their investment at below its true value.

regards
DF