The way you expressed your disagreement by calling "RUBBISH" again and again the facts I posted, clearly implied that you bothered using Antares metrics for Lonestar's valuation.
However, now you say that you do not bother using Antares' metrics as a comparison metric. Well, this is a smart change. You understood finally that you were wrong with your initial repeatedly use of the word "RUBBISH" because Antares and Lonestar are directly comparable. It is never too late.
Bottom line: Lonestar is grossly undervalued compared to Antares acquisition metrics (EV/EBITDA, EV/production) although Lonestar has much lower Net debt to EBITDA ratio, receives Higher pricing and is more oil-weighted than Antares.
What AZZ acquisition offer means for LONESTAR RESOURCES, page-15
Add LNR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.330M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $3.91K | 1.352M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1323804 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 23649539 | 33 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.58pm 08/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LNR (ASX) Chart |