Hingdog, I have never disputed the evidence, a point that seems conveniently ignored on this thread.
broady55, I have previously been involved in trying to help stop and protect thousands of people from being scammed on the internet. The method of how most scams work is by including elements of truth to give the scam credibility, that is how it hooks people.
Because of my dealings with people who have been scammed and those that have narrowly escaped being scammed, I have a low tolerance of people who purposely set out to deceive others. (Regardless of who they are.)
I don't expect journalists to get it right 100% of the time, but I do expect that they make the effort to be honest and accurate in their reporting.
As I posted a couple of times already on this thread, I wish to know the truth also,
Post #: 303517 "...I want the truth about Gillard's involvement as much as anyone else, but I will not accept being misled and deceived by shoddy journalism..."
Post #: 303494 "...So hopefully Ralph Blewitt gets his immunity and we get a clearer picture of the true events..."
