I am not sure why this upsets you so much, never mind.
But what I do not understand is your statements
:This report on a half page fat packet calculations" how do you know that?
"All collaborated by a Mosman employee who was independent QA on it.'- where is that said?
"without any further seismic 2d or 3d since 1968, geo modelling, or basically anything except throw the old numbers in a hat from 3 uneconomical wells"- where is that said?
"absolutely massive fracking operations would be required"- where is that said, or are you an expert in tight gas?
"enviro would be all over it like a rash"- maybe you are an environmental warrior as well?
"Then don't even start on downstream facilities and infrastructure, that's not needed according to AIM , just drill a little hole and they are all rich, quite totally and frankly amazing !"- I though the Mosman report clearly said this was the start, they made no pretence that is was further advanced than that
"So a 20-30 million well"- I don't see that number anywhere on the Mosman website?
Can I suggest you do not think that the company and some rogue blog site in the UK are one in the same.
I look forward to your answers.
Hopefully, it will not be way of abuse, I am just asking questions, and have keep my personal views to myself.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- What do we have here.
I am not sure why this upsets you so much, never mind. But what...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MEO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online