I am not sure why this upsets you so much, never mind.
But what I do not understand is your statements
:This report on a half page fat packet calculations" how do you know that?
"All collaborated by a Mosman employee who was independent QA on it.'- where is that said?
"without any further seismic 2d or 3d since 1968, geo modelling, or basically anything except throw the old numbers in a hat from 3 uneconomical wells"- where is that said?
"absolutely massive fracking operations would be required"- where is that said, or are you an expert in tight gas?
"enviro would be all over it like a rash"- maybe you are an environmental warrior as well?
"Then don't even start on downstream facilities and infrastructure, that's not needed according to AIM , just drill a little hole and they are all rich, quite totally and frankly amazing !"- I though the Mosman report clearly said this was the start, they made no pretence that is was further advanced than that
"So a 20-30 million well"- I don't see that number anywhere on the Mosman website?
Can I suggest you do not think that the company and some rogue blog site in the UK are one in the same.
I look forward to your answers.
Hopefully, it will not be way of abuse, I am just asking questions, and have keep my personal views to myself.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- What do we have here.
I am not sure why this upsets you so much, never mind. But what...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)