What does WE stand for?, page-2

Most interesting that Lockitt was moderated or "flaming and baiting". I thought that whilst his post was pretty pithy but it did not strike me as rude or debasing anyone. It definitely called out the "behaviour" of a poster who constantly trolls the Inca thread and I would venture to suggest has said far stronger things than what I read in the post by Lockitt. I can only assume that Lockitt got under someone skin and whilst they might like to 'dish it out" to others have a thin skin and can't take criticism. It will be most interesting to see what happens from here. Lockitt did ask some very relevant questions about when or whether some of the genuine questions of Inca shareholders will be answered in a meaningful and considered way rather than some flippant remark. Time will tell but I am not overly hopeful of a meaningful engagement and debate about issues of concern.