Cinovec has very low Li2O content 0.42% vs. 1% of EUR. And it's mica, not spodumene. So it's question how the technology used for Cinovec is economically feasible taking into account inflation, CAPEX costs, which doubled for the last two years, and higher prices of chemicals, while their higher consumption is needed for lower Li20 content.
Cinovec has very low Li2O content 0.42% vs. 1% of EUR. And...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 75 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
