It is unfettered arrogance and the illusion of power over nature and the universe to think so.''
is it now? musta been a hell of a coincidence then
''Thus, we find that a surface temperature increase around WW2 is a robust, statistically significant (5.2 sigma) feature of the data, and must either be a coincidence, due to systematic error that came and went around WW2, or direct evidence of the effect of human activity (an increase in combustion of various sorts) on the global climate. ''
