I am not sure if anyone has commented on Jeff Edwards' remarks in the latest ann, I found them rather significant. The contrast made between "chemistry" enhancements, which is facing a plateau in performance worldwide due to over-development, and OBJ's physical science methodology could mean that if OBJ's tech is proven during testing (and commercialization), it may be applied to many more products than expected:
"The attraction of OBJ's technology is that it offers a new path for performance enhancement based on physical science rather than chemistry and the potential for new levels of performance that compliments their current formulations."
The word that excites me is "path", which indicates that a paradigm shift in delivery technology could occur if OBJ and similar companies can commercialize this kind of tech. Which could mean that patents of such tech will be a goldmine for OBJ.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- what i thought was most significant about ann
what i thought was most significant about ann
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online