I think this announcement is very different.They have indicated...

I think this announcement is very different.

They have indicated uranium in a paeochannel similar to the adjoining alluvial deposits. The criticism they had was that the radioactivity was coming from a granite based source and as such ..meaningless.

What they are indicating here is that 2 out of the 4 sites have uranium in paleochannel consitant with the bigger type deposit

what they have to find out is the extent of the source and then find out if its economic...alluvial deposits tend to be very big tonnage so it could be in the 100s of millions of tones and they indicate as such by detailing the size of the paleochannel.....

I will wait for more info