GXY (ASX) What is behind our Galaxy's falling share price?

Originally posted by Facthunter ↑

Originally posted by Gekkko
Hopefully a lot of that covering was done during last week's short-squeeze up to $2.13..They didn't get any of my shares to cover..on the contrary I bought some more today at $1.96..under $2 is a steal given our bulletproof situation..Likely just days away from those northern SDV tenements being signed across to POSCO who probably want to buy more..and the Chilean floods adding more pressure to those exposed with open short positions..
Im still trying to work out what the con call was about.
The show was put on at the companies disgression, so what was the their thinking behind it.
It was no doubt a staged dialog delivered to gagged retail audience,AT could have been talking to his shoes, so what was it all about?
What was the message?

Expand

That's part of the reason why GXY is available at incredible sub $2 price right now. It was a bargain, now it's a steal..Nothing wrong with the business, brilliant transactions with more-to-come no doubt..and enviable assets..just poor communicators..AT needs a decent P.A. who can sort him a public-speaking coach to help him cut-down on the "kind of this and kind of that's"..A bit like the movie : The King's Speech ..and when he starts getting verbally-assertive he should exercize it by demanding his highly-paid deal broking adviser (GXY major shareholder J.P. Morgan) stop renting out their shares to short sellers..Until then the parasites get the opportunity-to-cover under $2..

The official-transfer of US $280 million + interest from POSCO is imminent. Argentina Court's long siesta is over and that should end the sub $2 price-tag. An immediate repatriation of J.P. Morgan's GXY shares would ensure that permanently..soon with a 3 in front of it..

Not "kind of stop-renting your GXY shares while we are 'kind of' paying you to consult with your inside-access to our books"..Cease & desist having your nose in every trough, Yank Bank..it's not 'kind of' a conflict of interest..it IS a conflict of interest..and should be imvestigated by ASIC..In the meantime there's one playing-field that is even..We get to compete with the parasites buying below $2..and the more we buy, the less they get-to-cover on the cheap Regards to the longs