The post wasn't directed at you but that was an interesting...

The post wasn't directed at you but that was an interesting response by you. I actually don't think you are a downramper, as I haver seen you on other threads and I know you love your rare earths, so I think tone yourself down - all perspectives are fine and this side of the market risk reward is a key, and ENV is a high risk reward play right now. VMM/MEI is not as risky as they have already shown IAC.

Ce is a light REE = liberation/movement means it moves to the top layers and therefore is not a definitive pathfinder because you have to test for it meaning it is not clear cut - it is what happens hence you would expect to see Ce is the top layer along with La etc The Ce loss in the lower layers is the key - the negative anomaly is the one that is the key before the METs, which is when you should have a good gauge of it with assays/Mets to confirm. In Post #: 73737283 was a link but here is some relevant paragraphs in that link - the last sentence is the key for you as that is a key to knowing what you have.


Also this geologist is pretty clear around when you know one from the other (i.e that is clay before IAC) - what he has said in the video is pretty spot on. And finally METs need to be done over the whole deposit and at various intervals before you know extent.

GeoInvest Insights on X: "Episode 9: Things You need to Know Before Investing in Rare Earths. https://t.co/7S3iSJrsI0" / X (twitter.com)

All IMO