what is france up to?, page-13

  1. 5,411 Posts.
    re: what is france up to? .... protecting iraqi oi Hi folks,

    Grant has made a good point:

    "3)protecting its own commercial and strategic interests
    in the region;"

    Let's look at that a little closer and we can see how this
    whole scenario is being played out for commercial gain
    by the big oil companies, on both sides of the Atlantic.

    Bush is simply being used by the home-grown US oilers
    to find way to divest the FRENCH, ITALIAN and GERMAN
    oil companies of their Iraqi oilfield interests.

    ..... using the excuse of WOMD is the perfect cover.

    --------

    Proof is as close as the price charts of these companies
    and their fundamentals.

    First up, let's take a look at a little history and some
    timing of events within the oil industry.

    With Clinton's term coming to an end, so to was the
    boom times for the oilers, at least for some.

    Schlumberger (Big Blue) saw the writing on the wall and
    attempted to sidestep some of the flak coming its way,
    through the change in Presidency.

    They did that by unloading their drilling arm,
    SEDCO FOREX, to an American competitor,
    Transocean (Code RIG) , but SLB retained a
    51% interest. Interesting about the timing of that
    deal, December 2000 ..... one month before Bush
    is sworn into office.

    Until August 2000, Schlumberger had operated in
    relative freedom under the Clinton administration, but
    with the prospect of Bush being elected, the story
    changed dramatically.

    Here was a company, with French roots, that was
    earning money in Iraq, during the period of sanctions.

    Now take a look at the SLB chart and since Bush was
    sworn in in January 2001, the SLB chart has been in a
    steady slide, even though oil prices were trending up
    during that period.

    In fact, from a high at $86.87 on 24082000, SLB slid
    to its lows in Oct 2002 at $33.40 ..... right around the
    time the weapons inspectors were admitted to Iraq.

    Since then the SLB price has steadily ticked up to
    its current level of $37.66, as the case for war
    diminishes.

    -------

    This slide in price could partly be attributed to SLB's
    own dictatorial attitude towards the oil companies,
    when supplying them with services ..... "we are the
    biggest and best ..... therefore you will pay the rate
    that we demand." ..... not so,said the oil companies.

    However, the main reason for the afflicted SLB price
    was surely the drawing of geopolitical boundaries by
    Bush regime that made it difficult for SLB to do business
    with American oil companies, while also maintaining a
    presence in Iraq, through their French parent.

    Let's compare the two oil services giants, US-based
    Halliburton and Schlumberger, over the past
    52 week period:

    Schlumberger low $33.40 high $86.87 now $37.66

    Halliburton low 8.97 high $21.65 now $18.60

    It is easy to see that the US company has been able
    to recover close to its 52 week high, whereas SLB has
    suffered, due to the US oil companies siphoning their
    business away from the French rebel, who has links
    in Iraq.

    After the 1991 conflict, SLB were asked to bid on a
    contract to send 21 land rigs into Iraq to rebuild the
    damaged oilfields ..... this project was on the
    drawing board for a year or more, before it was
    dropped, due to pressure from the US oil companies.

    ----------

    German companies, like Deutag, also stand to lose, if
    a US invasion comes to pass.

    So, its pressure from the oilfield interests in France
    and Germany, on their respective governments, that
    has seen the conflict within the UN, right along the lines
    of commercial interests in those oilfields.

    Likewise, it is the US oil companies pressuring Bush
    to go ahead with the invasion, that keeps their hopes
    alive of finally being able to get control of the only
    prize in IRAQ ..... its oilfields.

    -------

    Anybody who doesn't believe that this invasion is about
    control of Iraq's oilfields, please answer these questions:

    Who has the most to gain from an invasion?

    Answer: US oil companies .....

    ------------

    Why haven't the inspectors found any evidence of
    WOMD, nuclear or otherwise?

    Answer: Maybe, there's not many to find .....

    ------------

    Why is Bush so insistent on an invasion, against the
    wishes of many of his own people and the rest of the
    world?

    Answer: Pressure from US oil companies .....

    ------------
    How will the oilfields be divided after the invasion?

    Answer: Between US and British oil companies and
    maybe a few scraps for the allies .....

    ---------

    Strangely enough, after the invasion SLB will likely
    benefit anyway, since it will then be seen as an
    American company rebuilding IRAQ ......

    SLB has hedged its bets nicely, whatever happens
    in IRAQ, they stand to benefit ..... no war, they win
    via the French connection ..... after an invasion, the
    US oil companies will forgive them their sins and give
    a fellow-listed US company the seismic and logging
    contracts ..... even if it is only because SLB is the
    biggest .....

    hot charts all

    yogi
























 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.