Yes, it’s obvious that you believe anyone who has a positive outlook on the company, as a long term investment, is somehow paid by/linked to the company.
Yet you see no alterior motives with those who spout garbage negative pieces about the company or management, even when clearly and objectively false.
Give me a break.
My HC avatar is actually my real name and I have a Twitter account (Cheyne Dunford) that has my profile, photos etc (which some here know about).
I don’t hide behind fake avatars and made up names.....
I’m a long term investor, I also don’t post dishonest things with intent to manipulate (evident, given I’m publicly bullish on this stock, yet I’m still trying to accumulate as low as I can.... feel free to check top 20 holders).
Disagree with what I state all you want, civil debate and presenting differing points of view is productive and worthwhile.
But I can assure you, with a hint of research, my motives are much more transparent than someone who goes by the handle “ca$hcow” and posts garbage 1 liners.
Cheyne.
MCT Price at posting:
3.1¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held