Just to add a little gas to this fire,,, Following CGT brr episode last week I used the comms tool to ask a few questions and received zilch reply. For management they need to consider whats the point of opening up comms process and not responding.
I asked (before any one asks me)
1 if the tonnes treated were ROM or selected / sorted. If sorted the ore waste ratio,
2 if the drive was straight or meandered, following colour, structure and the like
3 what was the theoretical grade of the ore block where the drive was sited
4 did they keep the drive to nominal dimensions or did it blow out (where they found colour)
5 I noted that it was a bit rude for the management team that managed the joint into its present shape to get rewarded for improvements from this poor position for which they are responsible. Maybe strike a higher strike after which performance pay may be triggered. And if they cant hold present management, thats most likely to be a good thing.
I still think the project has great potential
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CGT
- what is happening?
what is happening?, page-17
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CGT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online