Don't they have to tie up 90% to make the takeover compulsory? I suppose it wouldn't matter as if they wanted to they could just take control with 50% and sell off the assets to a cover company. Either way I only get a small % of the long term expected profit.
Actually quite impressed with this company and the way they are tying in resources and future growth. It's in my Super fund so the 9% will do for the foreseeable future
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- UNV
- What is the problem with this Stock?
What is the problem with this Stock?, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)