what is the purpose of the tungsten subsidiary, page-14

Pcash

Clearly a number of the posters who matter on this thread havent responded to your questions....yet at least.

Re management I guess if one wanted to be critically objective one could certainly state that management have 'demonstrated' an ability to source projects, to negotiate, to break into, and in fact pioneer some moves into CIS countries.
On that evidence above it suggests good management.

On the other hand, since Uran havent acquired anything yet...and options to acquire a tenement dont count imo, then management is 'yet' to prove itself.

Pcash you would already have a reasonable handle on Uran and its management im 'guessing'

If its any consolation I waited a couple of months BEFORE investing in Uran...and still called it wrong.

Since you dont want further upsell comments I wont bother going further on that front....

Your questions are naive at best. Research further.
You seem to want unbiased opinion from many of us who are totally biased.

Call the company. Research further. Its a tough company to appraise. I was talking to a mate today who is also invested and he stated he just wants to invest in a company that 'makes sense'.

He has a point. Uran is complex. Its deals are complex. The political systems its working with are complex. Add to that historically vague explanations from management and you do get confusion...'one' of the reasons the market 'turned off' to Uran.

If I had my time over again I wouldnt have invested in this as I thought Uran and the Ukraine inparticular would be able to work through the earlier political issues.
That was naive.

The thread is waiting for further news obviously.