Okay. How about the following reasoning.
One of the directors was to retire but has obviously stepped back in to fill the gap. The other director is probably approaching retirement. As has been mentioned many times in these posts, their only means of income is through dividends so a slow cautious approach with regular dividends is their retirement funding. Why would they want to put that at risk?
The younger directors were appointed to sniff out gold, along with their mining experience. One at least had a heap of options pending which were convertible at 5.5cents from memory. They had time on their side, experience and the financial incentives to push things a bit harder than the old bulls. I just find it hard to believe that they would have resigned because they didn't like the Big Hairy Audicious Goals of the old bulls. The other way around just seems more logical to me.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- what needs to occur for this to appreciate in value
Okay. How about the following reasoning.One of the directors was...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 33 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BCN (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $97.67M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.6¢ | 2.6¢ | 2.5¢ | $55.65K | 2.217M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 562365 | 2.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.6¢ | 229630 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 562365 | 0.025 |
7 | 1225800 | 0.024 |
4 | 763579 | 0.023 |
3 | 1140000 | 0.022 |
3 | 299000 | 0.021 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.026 | 229630 | 2 |
0.027 | 841208 | 3 |
0.028 | 10007869 | 7 |
0.029 | 3785433 | 9 |
0.030 | 6373835 | 14 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 16/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BCN (ASX) Chart |