Share
1,273 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 180
clock Created with Sketch. 21/04/18
01:41
Share
Originally posted by Kevvy123
↑
The only difference to the previous position is that the company owned trees will be looked after by the Receivers, and that's all they cared about anyway. The financial difference is that the growers trees will be managed by them, and so the company will not get it's share of the management, harvesting and sale proceeds. You can forget about any new growers going forward anyway, as the ATO most likely will not give another tax ruling to the company, so they will need to come up with some new strategy, and reduce prices massively, to attract new investors.
Expand
u did not answer my q! u have named a lot of people u think are bad out for themselves but have complete faith in others. Convenient to ignore the truths u apply elsewhere to some why so selective?Do you know the actual truth and facts of who was involved with what part or parts of the series of issues leading to court cases we are not aware of?
Last edited by
Marla :
21/04/18
