what now!, page-20

This ann is anything but negative if you read it carefully and look at the location of the holes in relation to the tested formations. It is very poorly worded indeed, the maps are not well indicated and nothing is helping you to see the picture.

Just look at the location of holes ARC0003, ARC0006 and ARC0010 and the size of the area they enclose!! All these 3 holes give positive results, apart of ARC0010, which is awaiting results, but is noted to have visible Cu sulphides.
One wanders why isn't AC0010 the first to be tested - this hole extends the formation in the same direction as Maibele North, which is very logical and seems to be the right direction to dig.

Very strange that this positive outcome with the perimeter enclosed by ARC0003, 6 and 10 is not highlighted! It can extend even further to ARC0011.

Big deal that ACR0007-9, which, by the way are completely out of the zone in the Karoo Dolerite Dyke did not intersect Cu.

Very misleading to mention ACR0006-9 in the same contest as 'initial follow ups' as they follow up completely different targets.

Sugarbowl, what you're saying makes me think, especially after that confusing report, which if worded properly, could lift the SP significantly!!