ok so what I have gleend as follows1. Most of all the...

ok so what I have gleend as follows

1. Most of all the technically smart posters do not hold stock but feel this is unlikely to be another olympic dam.

2. the same people feel it is is not compelling that 193m of dis sulphides were discovered in one hole

3. They get proof from their belief that the massive sulphides were 300 metres down and thin width.

4.They have not been swayed that olymppic damn fround jack shit in the first 13 holes

5. The largets electromatic signature in Australia sways them not.

6. there seems to be no geo tech smarts arguing at this stock has anything of note

7. The argument is here that the gap has to be filled.

let me tell you something for nothing. i was a fund manager for 13 years, years ago. I that time i never saw one geo, mechanical engineer or the likes make a zak from the market unless they were a director of a mining outfit that milked their shareholders for disgusting amounts of money based on scientific proof they had found the next big find.

lads ignore the technical geniuses who feel the need to impart their knowledge but hold no stock. the motivation is zigmond fraud stuff.

Flux