Ah slixster but you have missed the fine print in the Stanwell Deal - Stanwell will be buying proven reserves of 340PJ's not a resource. They will pay Icon $36 million for 50% of 340PJ's. Stanwell have the right to extend the 4 blocks to half of ATP626 until Icon can prove reserves of 340PJ's
So a comparison with Pure is correct. The difference between Pure and Icon is the board of directors - Pure have a good, hard working, pragmatic board and Icon currently have ... well I think we know what Icon have don't we.
The market is always right. The market have evaluated the Icon board. If SH want a share price like Pure's they know what to do.
PS Slixster you might give some thought as to the cost of proving 340 PJ's of reserves - something of the order of $100 million. Where is that accounted for in the Stanwell Deal and where would the present incompetent directors of Icon find that money?
Answer - by a takeover.
Question - who benefits from a takeover?
Answer - not Icon SH but Ray James has a 2 year termination clause in his contract in the event of a takeover. So maybe the Ray James strategy is to rake up his already exhorbitant salary, run Icon out of money, then force a sell off and walk off into the sunset clutching his millions.
Nice if you can get it.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ICN
- what the neighbors think?
what the neighbors think?, page-18
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ICN (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.608M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
ICN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
NUZ
NEURIZON THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Michael Thurn, CEO & MD
Michael Thurn
CEO & MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online