ICN 0.00% 0.6¢ icon energy limited

Ah slixster but you have missed the fine print in the Stanwell...

  1. 31 Posts.
    Ah slixster but you have missed the fine print in the Stanwell Deal - Stanwell will be buying proven reserves of 340PJ's not a resource. They will pay Icon $36 million for 50% of 340PJ's. Stanwell have the right to extend the 4 blocks to half of ATP626 until Icon can prove reserves of 340PJ's

    So a comparison with Pure is correct. The difference between Pure and Icon is the board of directors - Pure have a good, hard working, pragmatic board and Icon currently have ... well I think we know what Icon have don't we.

    The market is always right. The market have evaluated the Icon board. If SH want a share price like Pure's they know what to do.

    PS Slixster you might give some thought as to the cost of proving 340 PJ's of reserves - something of the order of $100 million. Where is that accounted for in the Stanwell Deal and where would the present incompetent directors of Icon find that money?

    Answer - by a takeover.

    Question - who benefits from a takeover?

    Answer - not Icon SH but Ray James has a 2 year termination clause in his contract in the event of a takeover. So maybe the Ray James strategy is to rake up his already exhorbitant salary, run Icon out of money, then force a sell off and walk off into the sunset clutching his millions.

    Nice if you can get it.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add ICN (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.