What was Rittenhouse prosecuter thinking?, page-6

  1. 2,945 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1229
    This has just been a political show trial on a child.

    There's no such thing as a non-lethal firearm. If he knew anything about weapons he'd know:

    1) Assume every weapon is loaded - even if there's no mag and you've racked it, pulled the trigger, and racked it again
    2) Never point a weapon at anything you don't intend to kill.

    He showed he knows way less than the person he's accusing of being deadly with a firearm.

    Give a lefty a firearm and innocents die, as Baldwin demonstrated. Still no charges for him ... amazing.
    Last edited by RobThomas: 16/11/21
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.