Captain the quote I cut and pasted was from page 14 of the presentation and is not small print, it is the first point under energy absorbing applications and not discussions with US navy under the next section defense applications,
So I would assume by that they are in negotiations with car manufacturers seeing there is a connecting picture of car crash testing, I asked by phone if CFOAM was competitive with existing car body materials, and exhaust systems, yes was the answer,
I also asked if the facebook and tweets some members found on fitting out 76 ships at $1mill a pop was true and got I cannot comment on that,
But did get that they were ecstatic about Donny getting up in the election, more defense spending means more CFOAM
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CFO
- What we need
What we need, page-30
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 69 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CFO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online