what went wrong ?, page-42

I repeat
I am not underwater. I am fascinated by the interaction of stakeholders with the market. it is very interesting
I disclosed that way back, my minimalist approach given the headline blue sky.
the question I ask myself is this :
How do we know that 80% of 'informative' (especially unsupported info) posts relaying quasi-expert analysis or quasi-valuative opinion are not just a concoction of top 20 holders or anyone with a vested interest?
I will admit I am worried that in fact the soc exploration target upside as relayed thus far has altered given the recent annpouncements.
I wonder further how have these results impacted on the IP result, given the emphasis on arcadia over the '40 times Hobbs target'
I'd rather hear a genuine opinion rather than a vested spruikers spam booklet