Quite simply we can't be sure. The delisting was most likely to avoid a catastrophic failure of a quarterly.
The history of LVT is with misleading reporting, smoke and mirrors, and manipulation of data and messaging.
After a while, you can't cover the dead bodies.
Any sensible person would have bet this plan to profitability would have been a failure. Given the very public problems I would assume their largest customers would have given notice. Considering sales growth was pathetic and cash was minimal. One major unforeseen impact on cashflow and what happened was inevitable.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LVT
- What/who initiated the receivers
What/who initiated the receivers, page-2
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LVT (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.474M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LVT (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online