" The tax payer would save billions of dollars a year. I would significantly help the budget position. "
Not so sure about that ?
The thinking is that ng was introduced to encourage or incentivise investors into building/buying houses .
So if you take that away and the investors pull out as we keep hearing on here how crappy an investment property is , who do you is going to pick up the slack ?
Government housing anyone ?
As we all know , anything that the government does costs several times more .
You do know where the government's money comes from , don't you ?
- Forums
- Property
- what would happen if negative gearing was take
what would happen if negative gearing was take, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)