it seems meerkat thinks that with the rate of population growth even reducing carbon emissions 20% on a per capita basis worldwide is still going backwards...and he'd be right.
As I keep saying, it won't be AGW that first destroys the finite resources of this planet. It will be deforestation, overfishing, mass extinctions.
Doesn't mean we should do nothing but perhaps we could get better value per environmental dollar by redirecting our attention on things we can have more effect on?
