what's going on, page-5

redrock,you have been looking at the stats like i have & you are correct. but here is something interesting that no one has picked up on.The previous crushing contractor had built a 500 TPH wet plant to be installed beside his main plant,this was going to solve wet ore & seasonal issues.Can any one tell me why it was'nt put in when this plant would have given tty 4mtpa capacity with both plants? There report this year stated it was for commercial reasons,i am not quite sure i would believe that as the crushing contractor was the 9th largest shareholder.I would like to know what it has cost us shareholders the change over$ figures,in lost ships in the first & second quarter this year by not having it .I would say it has cost share holders a barrel load.I'm not quite sure wether i could believe their reports any more as here we are again in the wet season crying about wet weather,production problems.good to see them getting performance shares at our expense.What more can i say.
Merry Christmas to all fellow shareholders
PS do your own research.