I am not in favour of a name change.QPSX/IPR was very successful...

I am not in favour of a name change.

QPSX/IPR was very successful at its original business of IP assertion. It could and should have paid good dividends and stuck to what it was good at.

Instead it blew the shareholders winnings on a high risk start up that it had no skill in. That adventure has to date proved to be a failure despite a continual stream of promises and excuses.

My postings on this have been consistent and my predictions correct despite criticisms by others who said for years that next quarters earnings would be critical. Those loud posters have quietly slipped from this thread.

The real hope for IPR is in giving up the Nearmap disaster and going back to the IP business. A name change would indicate that the company intends to ride the flaming Nearmap disaster as it spirals all the way to the ground.

I hope those running the company have the fortitude to look critically and make a harsh assessment of where they are. The shares are 4c, thats the cold truth.

bacci