Why does NXT trade at 26 times the very rubbery contracted EBITDA, of circa $400M, whereas Airtrunk just transacted at 21 times?
From the AFR
the AirTrunk deal is understood to have been struck on a multiple of 21 times run-rate earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), a slightly rubbery number that takes in the commitments AirTrunk has secured from customers for the next few years.
NXT still looks expensive to me..
What's in the News, page-1655
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NXT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$17.12 |
Change
0.270(1.60%) |
Mkt cap ! $10.96B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $16.94 | $17.12 | $16.75 | $30.02M | 1.769M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4000 | $17.07 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $17.14 | 4659 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NXT (ASX) Chart |