Why does NXT trade at 26 times the very rubbery contracted EBITDA, of circa $400M, whereas Airtrunk just transacted at 21 times?
From the AFR
the AirTrunk deal is understood to have been struck on a multiple of 21 times run-rate earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), a slightly rubbery number that takes in the commitments AirTrunk has secured from customers for the next few years.
NXT still looks expensive to me..
Why does NXT trade at 26 times the very rubbery contracted...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NXT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$17.12 |
Change
0.270(1.60%) |
Mkt cap ! $10.96B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $16.94 | $17.12 | $16.75 | $30.02M | 1.769M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4000 | $17.07 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $17.14 | 4659 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NXT (ASX) Chart |