what's so good about mhm?, page-91

Coca Cola is the classic example.

The case against patents:

http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&source=hp&biw=1680&bih=916&q=the+case+against+patents&aq=0&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=the+case+against+paten&fp=6b8b1310b05d3ea

http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/000409.php

http://www.quebecoislibre.org/000902-3.htm
"Another issue that must be stressed is that the final responsibility for validating or invalidating a patent lies with the court. In practice, the burden of proof of infringement lies with the patent owner because the alleged offender is held innocent until proven guilty."

There's strong views each way about this, but it's in no way legitimate to just state. "You must have a patent."

This is pretty long.

http://mises.org/books/against.pdf