what's the point of arguing AGW and new energy anymore?, page-188

  1. 2,641 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 263
    > It point being it has less impact.
    Theres more to the lifecycle than just the mining, and I disagree this is the case.

    >based purely on where the activity is located?
    NIMBY at the start, yes, but when they end up in landfill, will be a problem.

    We didn't think that burning coal would be an issue either, did we?
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.