Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

when should Daniel Andrews RESIGN, page-19

First 19 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
estate09

7,206 Posts.

164

27/02/17

12:33

Post #: 22932437
Share

Originally posted by picastoc ↑

"Evidently an enormous "loophole" just begging to be exploited. So, why not?"
These two sentences enable a reader to comprehend clearly the intent of the writer.

The writer calls the legislation an 'enormous "loophole" just begging to be exploited' followed by the question "So, why not?" assumes that the subject of the second sentence is already very clearly identified as a loophole begging to be exploited and asks the question as to why anyone should be amazed that it is indeed being exploited. If this is objectionable, the law required to be changed. Sorry, but there is at least one poster on this thread who finds clear English very difficult to comprehend, judging by his/her silly response.

So why not exploit the loophole? That is clearly the entire meaning.
So why close the loophole? I have made no reference to closing the loophole. So, can't be my meaning.
So why not make him pay it back? I have made no reference to asking for it to be paid back. So, can't be my meaning.
So why not you go school to learn read write? Just a piece of nonsense.

Expand

Pic you are dealing with jonno here. The bar is very very low.
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

XRG

XReality Group wins $800K contract from Aus Government for military and police VR training tech

LLC

ACCC raises competition concerns about acquisition of Lendlease projects

LAT

Latitude 66 Shares Surge 8900% on Promising Exploration Update

AS2

Askari sets exploration target of up to 323K ounces Au at Burracoppin

SS1

Sun Silver gets that drill to thrill feeling from high grade hits at Maverick Spring

There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...

First 19 Last

SPONSORED BY