Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Pic you are dealing with jonno here. The bar is very very low.

First 19 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
estate09

7,367 Posts.

179

27/02/17

12:33

Post #: 22932437
Share

Originally posted by picastoc ↑

"Evidently an enormous "loophole" just begging to be exploited. So, why not?"
These two sentences enable a reader to comprehend clearly the intent of the writer.

The writer calls the legislation an 'enormous "loophole" just begging to be exploited' followed by the question "So, why not?" assumes that the subject of the second sentence is already very clearly identified as a loophole begging to be exploited and asks the question as to why anyone should be amazed that it is indeed being exploited. If this is objectionable, the law required to be changed. Sorry, but there is at least one poster on this thread who finds clear English very difficult to comprehend, judging by his/her silly response.

So why not exploit the loophole? That is clearly the entire meaning.
So why close the loophole? I have made no reference to closing the loophole. So, can't be my meaning.
So why not make him pay it back? I have made no reference to asking for it to be paid back. So, can't be my meaning.
So why not you go school to learn read write? Just a piece of nonsense.

Expand

Pic you are dealing with jonno here. The bar is very very low.
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

88E

HotCopper users smell capital raising as 88 Energy says "significant update" at Phoenix

BPM

BPM Minerals hits high-grade gold at the Claw Project WA; shares jump 86%

EXR

Essential Energy conference: Elixir talks up unlocking QLD's Taroom Trough

Essential Energy conference: Streamlining approvals key to the green energy transition

HVN

Harvey Norman clocks subdued gains as Echo Law's junk warranty class action kicks off

There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...

First 19 Last