It's not an apples for apples comparison. I don't know...

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Woolinky

918 Posts.

83

18/03/21

02:31

Post #: 51850843
Share

Originally posted by billybongo: ↑

In response to the thread header I suggest and hold the opinion that:

We have seen the ABC decide what specific allegations are a matter of public interest and watched them set about creating such.

Allegations the ABC, Labor, Greens and their supporters whom give special attention to in order to drive empathy for alleged victims and are stories which can be used to achieve their political objectives.

That is there appears to be an apparent selection process for rape and sexual assault allegations worthy of expressing what is essentially confected rage as it is arguably politically driven.

We just have to see the dismissive responses here when Kathy's plight to have her day in court is raised. Me too and women should be believed is thrown out the door, they treat her like an outcast when in fact she is in the very same class of allegations as the lady who accused Porter.

I note the ABC can't bring themselves to follow up on Kathy like they did allegations against Porters and going by the lack of public discussion they failed to show genuine interest in generating public interest in the face book allegations against the Labor camp.

Expand

It's not an apples for apples comparison. I don't know why people insist it is.

Again. Distraction. Last thing that scomo mentioned during question time just before the election. Was Bill shortens rape allegation. Can you please for a moment just have a look at how inept this government is and how it treats their women?

They are controlling the narrative and manipulating you. Can they take some blame for once, say there is a problem and fix things.

They are digging a hole and will not win the next election. Thank goodness for that.

Last edited by Woolinky: 18/03/21
8 Upvote

Reply