Your entire post is entirely irrelevant! Ohm did not exist 2...

Your entire post is entirely irrelevant! Ohm did not exist 2 years ago, hence I am curious as to what “the story” was to get the OP to invest, and what has actually happened to that story to sour his/her perspective.

i am curious, because 2 years ago I don’t think BUD had a clearly articulated story, let alone a roadmap to achieving it. They were broadly in the IOT sphere and were looking at a couple of acquisitions to get into the smart cities space. Ohm emerged from the failure of those acquisitions to complete, and the journey since then, over the last 15 months or so, has been one where progress has been solid and gaps in expectations between some investors and reality are as much to do with shareholder naivety as it does to over egging by the listed promoters.  Little bit of column A and little bit of column B but rather than engage in some personal reflection, it is easier to blame the expectation setting on management. I also had higher expectations than has transpired in reality, but have reflected on my contribution to that. There is little doubt that the BUD journey with Ohm is beyond the direct experience of management (hence perhaps the naivety in timeframes required to secure and then properly engage distribution channels) but that is not to say it is beyond their ability. The world is replete with very successful entrepreneurs whose success is based on ability, drive and passion (and some luck) as opposed to leveraging experience.

So I hark back to the “2 years” milepost. The story since then has only got better. So to the execution and the results.

IMO.  GLTA.