Hi Angry,
The shorting theory is almost certainly wrong, because if someone lend shares for shorting, it isn't deemed to be a sale of shares.
So if Global lent there shares out, they would still be a substantial shareholder. They would be owed those shares back.
The key words here are, beneficial interest.
where do we stand then...., page-28
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 94 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)