Where does this thing close on Monday?, page-216

Hmmm. Some things are strict liability. Doesn't matter what the intentions were.

The high court was unable to pin the false and misleading allegation (to do with statements about "binding agreements") on Twiggy but he's a special case. Is there enough at stake here for an examination of the statements put out by AGO or uttered by its management?

Consider that if somebody makes false and misleading statements, it is because either

(1) they intend to
(2) they didn't intend to, in other words they have no idea what they are saying.