Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I'm surprised you remain clueless about this proposed change to...

First 101 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bellcurve

9,204 Posts.

508

30/08/23

18:33

Post #: 69645131
Share

Originally posted by blueballs: ↑

No a no vote is just no vote for this proposal...it doesnt stop a voice being setup outside the constitution nor does it limit any other options

Blackfellas are free to create the voice exactly how they want, who is stopping them...they can get the funds from the niaa or the 1 bill sitting earning interest in the royalites fund.

Put there 24 representatives together however they think that will work and then take their recommendation to the minister that represents them and have them tabled in parliament

They dont just want a voice, this has been said by them and written by them...you are either a fool or a liar

Do not put this in the constituion

Expand

I'm surprised you remain clueless about this proposed change to the constitution.

it's a yes or no decision by voters: yes the constitution is changed in line with the question in the referendum. No, is a vote for no change.

you can build your fairy tale however you like. As we see this is unconnected with reality.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...

First 101 Last