All those tests are great - so which came first, the glue or the...

All those tests are great - so which came first, the glue or the tests? The time for casual questions is over. Which person, in which company is working on what product that requires a solution. IMO that's what ADO needs now and should have paid Polaris to tell them (and introduce them / joint pitch etc) - perhaps that's coming - certainly ADO should have asked a pointed question to Polaris confirming that they have that insider knowledge and contacts before engaging them. Whilst the energy benefit seems real and incredible did ADO actually go to a battery maker (or other user) and ask them what they want before they spent the dollars? I don't know the answer but that's because I really can't be bothered doing the research - you got me. I suspect if they had though they might have a deal by now - and who knows, maybe they might have created something just a little different to what the scientists thought the market wanted. My concern is - when you have a science driven organisation with one product in your kit the temptation is to believe in it and throw it as much as possible and hope it sticks somewhere. Shotgun style - you tend to miss a lot. Time (read 'money') for missing a lot is over. Just keep the word 'lithium' in every post and hope...

waving not drowning