Till,i'm not going to go into the issues regarding the relatively short life non recyclable renewable infrastructure or the non economic recycling characteristic of specific parts of the renewable infrastructure or the very serious question regarding the toxic carbon nano technology tube/web that is required to construct the wind turbines ie some manufacturers believe its the next asbestos.
So lets refer to my pet grievance regarding penns constant reference to climate change ie like tls doesn't have bigger problems.
Lets look at the total production tls bought from the macquarie built vic wind farm some time back and involved a few of tls's nas customers ie anz,ccamatil and monash uni.
Sounded good at the time but that was it.?
Tls was set to provide the nas energy distribution apps and services and manage the distribution for those 3 corporate energy customers.?
What happened,no more news.Was it because tls nas could not control the unreliable wind energy production to feed into the grid.?
Did the telstra chairman say tls was not getting into the obvious retail energy sector thru belong because tls does not want to b seen reselling 'fossil' fuels as in natural gas etc.?
Belong is a reseller,it should b reselliing energy as in gas and electricity.
Above imo is penns climate change ideology and is effecting tls's bottom line imo only.etc etc etc
You mention examples like amazon,google,facebook,apple,wow climate change extremists.?
In a couple of years the young wont b able to lay down outside at night and look up at the stars.They will b laying outside looking up at 100,000,200,000 plus satelites trying to pick out the stars in between if yr tech co's succeed.
I wouldn't make out yr tech examples are some type of humanitarian climate change charity organisations.
Ironic,tls was a superior telco,yr examples were not,one sold books online etc now 2 or 3 r investing billions in order to try and build a new global satelite internet system.etc banking,marketing/advertising.
ok penn still owns 35% of yellow pages.brilliant..
They have no need to enter the energy sector because the cost of energy in other countries is not financially attractive enough to invest in.
What is penn doing?Talking about climate change?
penn should be talking about expanding into sectors like yr examples are expanding into,or the unique opportunity the australian energy sector offers for tls.
As posted 2 weeks,lets see if pennhas total costs under control ,lets c if nas has a pulse or will it be written down..
Expand
(20min delay)