A problem with a cursory reference to law is when making a statement, as in regards to defamation, it may be deceptive due to not expanding to a full explanation. A chat forum doesn't lend it self to a full discussion, usually, therefore care needs to be taken not to give a false impression due to omission. There are many torts, one is injurious falsehood. While torts may or may not prove difficult to prove injury and damages casued by injury there are legal avenues available for a company to sue if it has suffered damage beyond defamation. As there should be. I am not a practising lawyer so happy to be corrected by a practising lawyer.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Where's Alex999?
A problem with a cursory reference to law is when making a...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SGH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online